| 
         
          | Letter to a Friend in Washington D.C.,
 
 We are born free, but forever we are in chains. Rousseau had observed 
            this truth which was to be immediately succeeded by a truism.... Forgive 
            me for this repetition of the obvious. I am simply responding to your 
            papers.
 
 You begin by saying that we as individuals have obligated ourselves 
            in a social contract of natural liberties. Our multitudes have gathered 
            and in this united body, no one can assail any of its members without 
            offending the body, nor can the body by assailed without the members 
            feeling the effect.
 
 Such is the theory of a social contract among a united people. And 
            yet in America, the body persists in becoming assailed at the expense 
            of certain underprivileged groups.
 
 It is often ignored that the political order of democracy is fueled 
            by its economic structure. I am concerned about your enthusiasm toward 
            what is effectively called democracy in America.
 
 You acknowledge at least that to sanction the right of occupancy on 
            any piece of land outside of titles, it must be through labor and 
            cultivation, not by vain ceremony. Rousseau had asked, when Nunez 
            Balboa, standing on the shore, proclaimed possession of the South 
            Seas and all of South America in the name of the crown of Castille, 
            was that enough to dispossess all of the inhabitants? I will answer 
            yes, it is enough, enough insofar as it has been, and still is, a 
            social and historical fact.
 
 Not many years before Balboa, Columbus himself, with no less audacity, 
            set off that same wheel of conquest, colonization, and imperialism.
 
 American Democracy has evolved into a terrible beauty, a Kafkaesque 
            sublime, a gateway intended for us but closed by our own volition. 
            I do not contest the right of the majority rule. I simply appeal from 
            the sovereignty of the people to the sovereignty of humanity.
 
 The system has so efficiently mechanized all of its shortcomings that 
            the cycles of inequity have become the terrible engines of this democracy 
            upon which a force was found so powerful as to be not unlike a perfect 
            monarchy. Mechanisms to foster apathy among the people, while preserving 
            a vague notion that they had a choice in this matter, are constantly 
            in motion. And the media, succumbing to the most base desires of the 
            public, delivers what will sell, not what is sound. This miserable 
            semblance of self and political affirmation distorts the true process 
            of self-government.
 
 With stratifications of wealth and poverty and a quota of welfare 
            and unemployment, the upward/downward mobility becomes the apparatus 
            of this economic structure. Balancing a careful form of wrongness 
            by the right measure, this prowess acclaims its essence in its inequity. 
            This we call opportunity.
 
 Between the glass ceiling and the trap door, and the many closets 
            for the socially deviant, this architecture of dissolution has its 
            archways engraved with the old dictum, Give unto Caesar. But where 
            is the decency? Perhaps you believe I have relinquished my right to 
            speak on this matter, having been ex-patriated. Still, it is about 
            human decency. Let us not forget of our origins. Our history is too 
            short.
 
 
 Paris
 |  |