Letter to a Friend in Washington D.C.,
We are born free, but forever we are in chains. Rousseau had observed
this truth which was to be immediately succeeded by a truism.... Forgive
me for this repetition of the obvious. I am simply responding to your
papers.
You begin by saying that we as individuals have obligated ourselves
in a social contract of natural liberties. Our multitudes have gathered
and in this united body, no one can assail any of its members without
offending the body, nor can the body by assailed without the members
feeling the effect.
Such is the theory of a social contract among a united people. And
yet in America, the body persists in becoming assailed at the expense
of certain underprivileged groups.
It is often ignored that the political order of democracy is fueled
by its economic structure. I am concerned about your enthusiasm toward
what is effectively called democracy in America.
You acknowledge at least that to sanction the right of occupancy on
any piece of land outside of titles, it must be through labor and
cultivation, not by vain ceremony. Rousseau had asked, when Nunez
Balboa, standing on the shore, proclaimed possession of the South
Seas and all of South America in the name of the crown of Castille,
was that enough to dispossess all of the inhabitants? I will answer
yes, it is enough, enough insofar as it has been, and still is, a
social and historical fact.
Not many years before Balboa, Columbus himself, with no less audacity,
set off that same wheel of conquest, colonization, and imperialism.
American Democracy has evolved into a terrible beauty, a Kafkaesque
sublime, a gateway intended for us but closed by our own volition.
I do not contest the right of the majority rule. I simply appeal from
the sovereignty of the people to the sovereignty of humanity.
The system has so efficiently mechanized all of its shortcomings that
the cycles of inequity have become the terrible engines of this democracy
upon which a force was found so powerful as to be not unlike a perfect
monarchy. Mechanisms to foster apathy among the people, while preserving
a vague notion that they had a choice in this matter, are constantly
in motion. And the media, succumbing to the most base desires of the
public, delivers what will sell, not what is sound. This miserable
semblance of self and political affirmation distorts the true process
of self-government.
With stratifications of wealth and poverty and a quota of welfare
and unemployment, the upward/downward mobility becomes the apparatus
of this economic structure. Balancing a careful form of wrongness
by the right measure, this prowess acclaims its essence in its inequity.
This we call opportunity.
Between the glass ceiling and the trap door, and the many closets
for the socially deviant, this architecture of dissolution has its
archways engraved with the old dictum, Give unto Caesar. But where
is the decency? Perhaps you believe I have relinquished my right to
speak on this matter, having been ex-patriated. Still, it is about
human decency. Let us not forget of our origins. Our history is too
short.
Paris |
|