|  | 5. 
        Case History 3.
 Certainly all the decision-making was difficult, taking large amounts 
        of time and consuming many peoples energies. Part of this was due 
        to the newness of the medium and our collective lack of Web experience, 
        but also because of our ambitiousness. Rather than publish the conventional 
        photographs of war we were attempting to understand how peoples viciously 
        killing each other for years arrive at peace, and provide forums to discuss 
        strategies of resolution; rather than circumvent the photographer freshly 
        back from extraordinarily intense experiences and highly invested in his 
        own work we gave him center stage; rather than produce the site primarily 
        relying on the authority of the New York Times we were, by creating a 
        dialectic among photographer, subject and reader, seeming to almost undermine 
        it. Computers were set up at the Hague where a war crimes trial was beginning, 
        at the United Nations, and through the Soros Foundation in Sarajevo so 
        that non-Times subscribers could more easily participate (the Times sent 
        out 200,000 e-mail messages to its subscribers announcing the site, and 
        made it free to anyone with Internet access who wanted to enter). 
        1
 
 Certain of our desires for the project were not accomplished. We were 
        enchanted for a while with the idea of keeping track of a readers 
        movements so that more mixing of pathways could occur and each reader 
        might reenter the site differently, building upon what each had already 
        seen (one reader told me that it took her four hours to go through the 
        site), but it would have involved too many demands upon the Times server. 
        I had wanted to engage the subjects point of view as a prime navigational 
        metaphor, so that if a reader clicked on a picture of a Muslim woman unbeknownst 
        to him he would later on be prohibited from selecting pictures of Serbs, 
        perhaps rejected from some of the Serbian enclaves represented on the 
        Web, as happened to the inhabitants of Sarajevo who were continually being 
        circumscribed by their own ethnicity.There were problems setting up computer 
        access in Sarajevo - a new medium, it was not a priority for many in Sarajevo, 
        and the discussion groups were largely dominated by pro-Serbian commentators 
        living in the US who felt vilified by the conventional media. Also, the 
        complexity of experiences available to the reader through the photography 
        was not nearly as great as we had initially wanted, but then again we 
        had to weigh that against the fact that this site was already much more 
        complex than almost any photojournalistic foray ever attempted in any 
        medium.
 
 1. 
        Many others contributed in important ways to this project, most especially 
        Times forum moderator and senior editor Bernard Gwertzman, design director 
        Ron Louie, content development editor Elizabeth Osder and online news 
        editor Jean-Claude Bouis who did the audio interviews, international forum 
        producer Alison Cornyn (IBM helped installing computer terminals in the 
        Hague and the UN), and Indigo Information Design's Lucy Kneebone, Melissa 
        Tardiff and Amnon Dekel--the latter's early input was essential to the 
        interactive design.
 |  |